AERI’s cutting-edge High-Altitude Missile Initial Interception System (HAMIIS)
Quantum Physicist and Brain Scientist
Visiting Professor of Quantum Physics,
California Institute of Technology
IEEE-USA Fellow
American Physical Society-USA Fellow
PhD. & Dr. Kazuto Kamuro
AERI：Artificial Evolution Research Institute
Pasadena, California
✼••┈┈••✼••┈┈••✼••┈┈••✼••┈┈••✼••┈┈••✼••┈┈••✼
1．Recent laser-based missile defense systems in the world
In recent years, laser technologies have gained significant attention as potential solutions for countering missile threats. Today, we will explore the fundamental principles, advantages, and specific examples of laser-based missile defense systems.
I. Introduction to Laser-based Missile Defense Systems:
Missile defense systems utilizing lasers harness the unique properties of laser beams, such as coherence, collimation, and high energy density, to intercept and neutralize incoming missiles. These systems can be ground-based, airborne, or even space-based, providing versatility in deployment and coverage.
II. Advantages of Laser-based Missile Defense Systems:
Laser-based systems offer several advantages over traditional missile defense technologies:
(1) Speed: Laser beams travel at the speed of light, providing an almost instantaneous response to missile threats, greatly reducing the threat response time.
(2) Precision: Lasers can precisely track and target incoming missiles, increasing the interception accuracy and minimizing collateral damage to surrounding areas.
(3) Scalability: Laser systems can be designed with varying power levels, allowing them to engage different types of threats, ranging from small projectiles to more advanced ballistic missiles.
Cost-effectiveness: Compared to conventional missile interceptors, lasers have the potential for lower operational costs due to their unlimited ammunition and reduced need for physical reloading.
(4) Flexibility: Laser-based systems can engage multiple threats successively without significant downtime, enhancing their operational efficiency.
III. Specific Examples of Laser-based Missile Defense Systems:
(1) The Lockheed Martin Area Defense Anti-Munitions (ADAM) System:
The ADAM system developed by Lockheed Martin is a ground-based laser weapon system designed to detect, track, and destroy unmanned aerial systems (UAS), rockets, and mortars. It utilizes a high-energy fiber laser to engage and neutralize these threats. ADAM has demonstrated successful engagements in multiple test scenarios, showcasing the effectiveness of laser-based systems in countering small airborne targets.
(2) The Boeing Airborne Laser (ABL) System:
The Airborne Laser (ABL) system, developed by Boeing and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA), was an airborne platform mounted on a modified Boeing 747-400F aircraft. It employed a high-energy chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL) to engage and destroy ballistic missiles during their boost phase. Although the ABL program was discontinued, it demonstrated the feasibility of airborne laser systems in intercepting ballistic missiles.
(3) The Israeli Iron Dome System with Iron Beam:
The Iron Dome missile defense system developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems primarily employs interceptor missiles. However, it also incorporates a laser-based component known as "Iron Beam." Iron Beam is designed to intercept short-range rockets, mortars, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). It utilizes high-energy lasers to track, target, and neutralize incoming threats. The Iron Dome system with Iron Beam has demonstrated successful engagements against a variety of targets, showcasing the potential of laser-based interceptors.
(4) The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Excalibur Laser:
The Excalibur laser program, led by DARPA, aims to develop a scalable, high-power laser system for missile defense. The system utilizes multiple lasers combined into a single beam, achieving high energy output. It focuses on intercepting and destroying tactical ballistic missiles during their boost phase. The Excalibur program is still under development, and its success could pave the way for future laser-based missile defense systems.
IV. Challenges and Future Developments:
While laser-based missile defense systems offer promising capabilities, several challenges need to be addressed:
(1) Power and Energy Requirements: High-power lasers require substantial energy sources and cooling mechanisms to maintain their effectiveness during prolonged engagements.
(2) Atmospheric Interference: Atmospheric conditions such as clouds, dust, and turbulence can affect the propagation of laser beams, potentially reducing their effectiveness at long distances.
(3) Countermeasures: Adversaries may develop countermeasures to protect their missiles from laser attacks, such as reflective coatings or decoy systems.
Cost and Integration: Developing, deploying, and maintaining laser-based defense systems can involve significant costs and integration challenges.
“In conclusion, laser-based missile defense systems provide exciting possibilities for countering missile threats with their speed, precision, and scalability. The examples discussed today highlight the progress and potential of laser technology in intercepting various types of missiles. As research and development continue, laser-based systems may play an increasingly significant role in future missile defense strategies, contributing to enhanced global security,”professor Kamuro advised.
2. The recent manufacturers
Disclose in detail the recent manufacturer name, model name, power output, range, and features of the laser-based missile defense system with specific examples.
Here are some specific examples of laser-based missile defense systems, along with their manufacturer names, model names, power outputs, ranges, and notable features:
(1) Lockheed Martin ATHENA (Advanced Test High Energy Asset):
Manufacturer: Lockheed Martin
Model Name: ATHENA
Power Output: ATHENA utilizes a high-power fiber laser with a power output of over 30 kilowatts (kW).
Range: The exact range of ATHENA has not been publicly disclosed, but it is designed for short-range engagements.
Features: ATHENA is a ground-based laser system that combines multiple fiber laser modules to create a powerful directed-energy weapon. It has demonstrated the capability to disable and destroy unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and small-caliber rockets. The system is modular and can be integrated into larger missile defense networks.
(2) Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser (ABL):
Manufacturer: The Boeing Company
Model Name: YAL-1 ABL
Power Output: The YAL-1 ABL employed a high-energy chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL) with an estimated power output of around 100 kilowatts (kW).
Range: The YAL-1 ABL was designed to engage ballistic missiles during their boost phase, which typically occurs within a range of a few hundred kilometers.
Features: The YAL-1 ABL was an airborne laser weapon system mounted on a modified Boeing 747-400F aircraft. It successfully destroyed several ballistic missile targets during test scenarios, demonstrating the feasibility of airborne laser systems for intercepting missiles in their early stages of flight.
(3) Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome with Iron Beam:
Manufacturer: Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
Model Names: Iron Dome (missile defense system), Iron Beam (laser-based component)
Power Output: The specific power output of the Iron Beam laser has not been publicly disclosed.
Range: The Iron Dome system, including the Iron Beam component, is designed for short-range engagements, typically within a range of tens of kilometers.
Features: The Iron Dome missile defense system primarily employs interceptor missiles. However, it also incorporates a laser-based component known as Iron Beam. Iron Beam is designed to intercept short-range rockets, mortars, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). It utilizes high-energy lasers to track, target, and neutralize incoming threats. The Iron Dome system with Iron Beam has demonstrated successful engagements against various types of targets.
Please note that specific details such as power output and range may vary depending on the version, upgrades, and classified information about these systems. The examples provided here offer a general overview of laser-based missile defense systems from different manufacturers.
3. Advantages and disadvantages of missile defense systems using ultra-high power lasers:
(1) Advantages:
(a) Speed and Reaction Time: Ultra-high power lasers travel at the speed of light, providing an almost instantaneous engagement capability. This enables the system to respond rapidly to incoming missile threats, reducing the threat response time and increasing the likelihood of successful interception.
(b) Precision and Accuracy: Ultra-high power lasers offer exceptional precision and accuracy in targeting and tracking incoming missiles. The coherent and collimated nature of laser beams allows for precise aim, minimizing the risk of collateral damage to nearby assets or civilian populations.
(c) Extended Engagement Range: Ultra-high power lasers can engage targets at long distances, providing an extended engagement range. This increases the defended area and allows for interception of threats before they reach their intended targets.
(d) Scalability: Laser-based missile defense systems with ultra-high power lasers can be designed with scalable power levels. This flexibility enables them to engage different types of threats, from small projectiles to more advanced ballistic missiles, providing a versatile defense capability.
(e) Cost-effectiveness: Compared to traditional kinetic interceptors, ultra-high power laser systems can be cost-effective in the long run. Once developed and deployed, lasers have the potential for lower operational costs due to their unlimited ammunition and reduced need for physical reloading.
(2) Disadvantages:
(a) Atmospheric Interference: Laser beams can be affected by atmospheric conditions such as clouds, dust, and turbulence. These factors can scatter or attenuate the laser energy, reducing its effectiveness over long distances. Weather conditions may limit the operational capability of laser-based systems, especially in adverse environments.
(b) Power Requirements and Cooling: Ultra-high power lasers require substantial amounts of energy to operate at their full potential. Ensuring a continuous power supply and managing the associated heat generated by the lasers can be challenging and may require advanced cooling systems.
(c) Countermeasures: Adversaries may develop countermeasures to protect their missiles from laser attacks. For example, they may use reflective or ablative materials on their missiles to minimize the effects of laser energy. Additionally, decoy systems and advanced guidance technologies may be employed to divert or confuse laser-based defense systems.
(d) Cost of Development and Deployment: Developing and deploying ultra-high power laser systems for missile defense can be a complex and costly endeavor. Research and development costs, as well as the need for specialized infrastructure and personnel training, can contribute to significant initial investments.
(e) Power Limitations: Despite advances in laser technology, there are practical limits to the power output of lasers. Extremely high-powered lasers may face technical challenges related to efficiency, size, weight, and thermal management. These limitations may impact the system's effectiveness against certain types of threats.
“It is worth noting that ongoing research, technological advancements, and operational experience can address some of these disadvantages, further improving the capabilities and effectiveness of laser-based missile defense systems using ultra-high power lasers,” professor Kamuro advised.
4. Can a missile defense system using an ultra-high power laser shoot down an F16?
While it is theoretically possible for a missile defense system using an ultra-high power laser to shoot down an F-16 fighter jet, several factors need to be considered:
(1) Laser Power and Range: The laser system must possess sufficient power to damage or destroy the target aircraft. Ultra-high power lasers have the potential to cause significant damage to aircraft structures, systems, or components if focused on a specific area for a sufficient duration. The laser's range also plays a crucial role, as it must be able to reach and engage the target aircraft at the required distance.
(2) Target Acquisition and Tracking: Successfully engaging a fast-moving aircraft like an F-16 requires accurate target acquisition and tracking capabilities. The laser system must be capable of rapidly acquiring and precisely tracking the aircraft's position, speed, and trajectory to maintain a consistent and accurate aim.
(3) Countermeasures: Modern fighter aircraft are equipped with various countermeasures to protect against missile and laser threats. These countermeasures may include infrared countermeasures, laser warning receivers, and anti-laser coatings on critical surfaces. These defensive measures can reduce the effectiveness of laser-based attacks and potentially increase the difficulty of successfully shooting down an F-16.
(4) Maneuverability and Speed: Fighter aircraft like the F-16 possess high maneuverability and speed, which can make them challenging targets for laser-based systems. The ability of the laser system to maintain consistent tracking and engagement despite the aircraft's rapid movements is essential.
“It is worth noting that the technology and operational capabilities of laser-based systems for shooting down aircraft are still evolving. While laser systems have shown promising results in laboratory and controlled testing environments, there may be practical challenges when it comes to real-world implementation and engagement of fast-moving targets like fighter jets.
Moreover, the use of lasers against aircraft carries additional legal and ethical considerations, as lasers can potentially cause harm to pilots or passengers. The use of lasers in a defensive capacity against airborne threats is subject to strict rules and regulations.
In summary, while a missile defense system using an ultra-high power laser may have the potential to engage and shoot down an F-16 fighter jet, the practicality, effectiveness, and feasibility of such a scenario depend on various technical, operational, and legal factors,” professor Kamuro advised.
5. Can a missile defense system using ultra-high-power lasers shoot down Su-35 and Su-75 fighters?
The ability of a missile defense system using ultra-high-power lasers to shoot down Su-35 and Su-75 fighters depends on several factors:
(1) Laser Power and Range: Ultra-high-power lasers have the potential to cause significant damage to aircraft structures, systems, or components if focused on a specific area for a sufficient duration. The laser system must possess sufficient power to effectively engage and neutralize the targeted aircraft. The range of the laser is also crucial, as it needs to be able to reach and engage the target aircraft at the required distance.
(2) Target Acquisition and Tracking: Successfully engaging fast-moving fighter aircraft requires precise target acquisition and tracking capabilities. The laser system must be capable of rapidly acquiring and accurately tracking the aircraft's position, speed, and trajectory to maintain a consistent and accurate aim. The advanced maneuverability and speed of aircraft like the Su-35 and Su-75 pose challenges in maintaining effective tracking and engagement.
(3) Countermeasures: Modern fighter aircraft are equipped with advanced defensive countermeasures to protect against missile and laser threats. These countermeasures may include infrared countermeasures, laser warning receivers, and anti-laser coatings on critical surfaces. These defensive measures can reduce the effectiveness of laser-based attacks and increase the difficulty of successfully shooting down fighter aircraft.
(4) Maneuverability and Speed: Fighter aircraft like the Su-35 and Su-75 are known for their high maneuverability and speed. The ability of the laser system to maintain consistent tracking and engagement despite the aircraft's rapid movements is essential. The laser system would need to account for these factors to ensure accurate and effective targeting.
“It is important to note that laser-based systems for shooting down aircraft are still in the development and testing phase. While there have been advancements in laser technology, real-world implementation against fast-moving fighter aircraft presents significant challenges. The practicality, effectiveness, and feasibility of shooting down Su-35 and Su-75 fighters using laser-based systems depend on the specific capabilities and limitations of the laser system, as well as the tactics, techniques, and countermeasures employed by the targeted aircraft.
Furthermore, the use of lasers against aircraft carries legal and ethical considerations. The use of lasers in a defensive capacity against airborne threats is subject to strict rules and regulations.
In summary, while there is potential for missile defense systems using ultra-high-power lasers to engage and neutralize fighter aircraft like the Su-35 and Su-75, practical implementation and effectiveness depend on various technical, operational, and legal factors. Ongoing research and development are necessary to overcome the challenges associated with engaging fast and maneuverable aircraft using laser-based systems,”professor Kamuro advised.
6. Disabling a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier like the Nimitz using a missile defense system with ultra-high-power lasers presents several challenges:
(1) Size and Structure: Aircraft carriers like the Nimitz are massive and heavily fortified vessels with multiple layers of armor and shielding. The structural integrity of the carrier, along with its complex internal systems, presents significant challenges for a laser-based system to disable it effectively.
(2) Power and Range: Ultra-high-power lasers would need to generate a significant amount of energy to penetrate the carrier's defenses and disable critical components. Additionally, the laser system would require a range long enough to reach the carrier, which can be several kilometers away.
(3) Countermeasures: Modern naval vessels, including aircraft carriers, are equipped with advanced defense systems to counter missile threats, including lasers. These countermeasures may include laser warning receivers, directed energy countermeasures, or anti-laser coatings on critical surfaces. These defensive measures can significantly reduce the effectiveness of laser-based attacks, making it more challenging to disable the carrier.
(4) Redundancy and Damage Control: Aircraft carriers are designed with redundancy in their systems and compartments, allowing them to continue operations even if certain areas are damaged. They also have extensive damage control capabilities to mitigate the effects of any attacks. These factors make it more difficult to disable the carrier entirely through a laser-based attack.
“It is important to note that the primary purpose of missile defense systems is to intercept and destroy incoming missiles or projectiles rather than targeting large naval vessels like aircraft carriers. Laser-based systems, especially those still in the development phase, are primarily designed and tested for engagements against smaller targets such as drones, rockets, or short-range missiles.
Furthermore, the use of lasers against military vessels carries legal and ethical considerations, and the engagement of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would have severe geopolitical implications.
In summary, disabling a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier like the Nimitz using a missile defense system with ultra-high-power lasers is highly complex and presents significant technical and operational challenges. The capabilities of laser-based systems and the countermeasures employed by the carrier would determine the feasibility and effectiveness of such an attack,”professor Kamuro advised.
7. Disabling a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier like the Nimitz using a missile defense system with ultra-high-power lasers presents several challenges:
(1) Size and Structure: Aircraft carriers like the Nimitz are massive and heavily fortified vessels with multiple layers of armor and shielding. The structural integrity of the carrier, along with its complex internal systems, presents significant challenges for a laser-based system to disable it effectively.
(2) Power and Range: Ultra-high-power lasers would need to generate a significant amount of energy to penetrate the carrier's defenses and disable critical components. Additionally, the laser system would require a range long enough to reach the carrier, which can be several kilometers away.
(3) Countermeasures: Modern naval vessels, including aircraft carriers, are equipped with advanced defense systems to counter missile threats, including lasers. These countermeasures may include laser warning receivers, directed energy countermeasures, or anti-laser coatings on critical surfaces. These defensive measures can significantly reduce the effectiveness of laser-based attacks, making it more challenging to disable the carrier.
(4) Redundancy and Damage Control: Aircraft carriers are designed with redundancy in their systems and compartments, allowing them to continue operations even if certain areas are damaged. They also have extensive damage control capabilities to mitigate the effects of any attacks. These factors make it more difficult to disable the carrier entirely through a laser-based attack.
“It is important to note that the primary purpose of missile defense systems is to intercept and destroy incoming missiles or projectiles rather than targeting large naval vessels like aircraft carriers. Laser-based systems, especially those still in the development phase, are primarily designed and tested for engagements against smaller targets such as drones, rockets, or short-range missiles.
Furthermore, the use of lasers against military vessels carries legal and ethical considerations, and the engagement of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would have severe geopolitical implications.
In summary, disabling a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier like the Nimitz using a missile defense system with ultra-high-power lasers is highly complex and presents significant technical and operational challenges. The capabilities of laser-based systems and the countermeasures employed by the carrier would determine the feasibility and effectiveness of such an attack,”professor Kamuro advised.
8. Is a missile defense system using an ultra-high power laser effective in sniping an enemy instead of a rifle?
A missile defense system using an ultra-high power laser is not effective for sniping enemies like a rifle. While ultra-high power lasers can deliver focused energy over long distances, they are not suitable for precision targeting and engagement of individual human targets.
reasons:
(1) Area Coverage: Missile defense systems with ultra-high power lasers are designed to engage and intercept fast-moving targets like missiles, drones, or projectiles over a wide area. The lasers used in these systems are typically optimized for large-scale engagements rather than the precision required for sniping individual human targets.
(2) Target Identification and Tracking: Sniping involves identifying and tracking a specific target, taking into account factors like distance, wind, target movement, and other environmental conditions. Laser-based systems for missile defense are not designed with the necessary sensors, optics, or algorithms to accurately identify and track individual human targets in real-time.
(3) Legal and Ethical Considerations: The use of lethal force against human targets, even in a combat situation, is subject to strict rules of engagement and legal frameworks. The use of lasers against human targets raises significant legal and ethical concerns, and specific regulations govern the use of directed energy weapons for engaging personnel.
(4) Range and Environmental Factors: Ultra-high power lasers can experience limitations due to factors such as atmospheric interference, scattering, and absorption. These limitations can affect the effectiveness of the laser beam over long distances and in adverse weather conditions, making it impractical for precision sniping scenarios.
“In summary, while ultra-high power lasers can be effective in engaging and intercepting fast-moving targets at a large scale, they are not designed or suitable for sniping individual human targets. Sniping requires specialized weapons, optics, and training tailored for precision engagement, which is different from the capabilities and design of laser-based missile defense systems,”professor Kamuro advised.
9. A missile defense system using an ultra-high power laser has the potential to engage and destroy certain types of missiles, including:
(1) Ground-to-Surface Missiles: Laser-based systems can potentially engage and destroy ground-to-surface missiles, which are launched from the ground and target surface-based targets such as infrastructure, military installations, or population centers. The effectiveness of engaging ground-to-surface missiles depends on factors such as the laser system's power, range, and tracking capabilities, as well as the missile's speed, trajectory, and countermeasures.
(2) Cruise Missiles: Cruise missiles, which fly at low altitudes and are highly maneuverable, can pose a significant threat due to their ability to evade traditional air defense systems. Laser-based missile defense systems have the potential to engage and destroy cruise missiles, provided they have the necessary tracking and engagement capabilities to match the speed and agility of the target.
(3) Hypersonic Missiles: Hypersonic missiles, which travel at speeds exceeding Mach 5 (approximately 6,174 km/h or 3,836 mph), present unique challenges for missile defense systems. While ultra-high power lasers have the potential to engage hypersonic missiles, the speed and maneuverability of these missiles pose significant technical difficulties. Advanced laser systems specifically designed to engage hypersonic threats would be required.
(4) Anti-Ship Missiles: Anti-ship missiles are designed to target naval vessels, including aircraft carriers, destroyers, and other warships. Laser-based systems can potentially engage and destroy anti-ship missiles, reducing the threat to naval assets. However, the effectiveness depends on factors such as the laser system's power, range, tracking capabilities, and countermeasures employed by the anti-ship missiles.
(5) Anti-Submarine Missiles: Anti-submarine missiles are specifically designed to target submarines and are generally launched from aircraft or surface ships. Laser-based systems are less effective in engaging and destroying submerged targets, such as submarines, as lasers have limited penetration capabilities in water. Anti-submarine warfare typically relies on other detection and engagement methods, such as sonar and torpedoes.
(6) Anti-Aircraft Missiles: Laser-based missile defense systems are primarily designed to engage and destroy incoming projectiles, such as missiles, rather than engaging anti-aircraft missiles launched from the ground. Traditional anti-aircraft missile defense systems, such as surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems, are more suitable for engaging and countering anti-aircraft threats.
“It is important to note that the engagement and destruction of specific types of missiles using ultra-high power lasers depend on various technical, operational, and environmental factors. Factors such as the laser system's power, range, tracking capabilities, countermeasures employed by the missiles, atmospheric conditions, and advancements in laser technology all influence the effectiveness and success of engagements against different types of missiles,”professor Kamuro advised.
10. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense
The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) element provides the Missile Defense System with a globally-transportable, rapidly-deployable capability to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles inside or outside the atmosphere during their final, or terminal, phase of flight.
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), formerly Theater High Altitude Area Defense, is an American anti-ballistic missile defense system designed to shoot down short, medium, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase (descent or reentry) by intercepting with a hit-to-kill approach. THAAD was developed after the experience of Iraq's Scud missile attacks during the Gulf War in 1991. The THAAD interceptor carries no warhead, instead relying on its kinetic energy of impact to destroy the incoming missile.
Originally a United States Army program, THAAD has come under the umbrella of the Missile Defense Agency. The Navy has a similar program, the sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System, which also has a land component ("Aegis Ashore"). THAAD was originally scheduled for deployment in 2012, but initial deployment took place in May 2008. THAAD has been deployed in the United Arab Emirates, Israel, Romania, and South Korea.
On 17 January 2022, THAAD made its first operational interception, of an incoming medium-range ballistic missile in the UAE.
The THAAD missile defense concept was proposed in 1987, with a formal request for proposals submitted to industry in 1991. The THAAD program benefited from results of previous missile defense efforts like High Endoatmospheric Defense Interceptor (HEDI) and the Kinetic Kill Vehicle Integrated Technology Experiment (KITE). In September 1992, the US Army selected Lockheed (now Lockheed Martin) as prime contractor for THAAD development. Prior to development of a physical prototype, the Aero-Optical Effect (AOE) software code was developed to validate the intended operational profile of Lockheed's proposed design. The first THAAD flight test occurred in April 1995, with all flight tests in the demonstration-validation (DEM-VAL) program phase occurring at White Sands Missile Range. The first six intercept attempts missed the target (Flights 4–9). The first successful intercepts were conducted on 10 June 1999 and 2 August 1999, against Hera missiles.
The vulnerability and lethality analyses of THAAD have been conducted by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL). The vulnerability assessment for the THAAD featured an evaluation of the effects of major electromagnetic elements. This included EM interference, EM radiation operations, EM radiation hazards, EM pulse, electrostatic discharge, and lightning effects on components of the THAAD system.
The ARL assessments were designed to determine the THAAD system's growth potential given its tactical design as well as provide survivability analysis against threats such as conventional weapons, chemical weapons, and electronic warfare countermeasures. The data collected from the analyses were used to develop trajectory models for targets and missile as well as target trajectories using infrared scene generation of infrared countermeasures (IRCMs).
The THAAD system is being designed, built, and integrated by Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control acting as prime contractor. Key subcontractors include Raytheon, Boeing, Aerojet Rocketdyne, Honeywell, BAE Systems, Oshkosh Defense, and MiltonCAT.
11. HAMIIS: AERI’s state of art missile initial interception system
The high-altitude missile initial interception system (HAMIIS) provides the Missile Defense System with a globally-transportable, rapidly-deployable capability to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles inside or outside the atmosphere during their initial, or early/initial stages after missile launch, not during their final, nor terminal, phase of flight.
The high-altitude missile initial interception system (HAMIIS), which is being researched and developed by AERI (Artificial Evolution Research Institute HP: https://www.aeri-japan.com/ ), has seven types of interception system using the peta-to-hexawatt class ultra-high power femtosecond CW or pulsed laser (AERI/HEL) under research and development at AERI (AERI/HEL) under research and development at AERI (Artificial Evolution Research Institute HP： https://www.aeri-japan.com/ ), i.e. (1) AERI HEL surface-to-air defense laser system, (2) AERI HEL surface-to-air defense laser system, (3) Next-generation interceptor laser system for AERI･HEL anti-fighter aircraft, (4) Next-generation interceptor laser system for AERI･HEL anti-missile, (5) Next-generation interceptor laser system for AERI･HEL versus ICBM, (6) AERI HEL surface-to-air defense laser system, (7) AERI･HEL Theater High Altitude Interceptor Missile System, are provided.
****************************************************************************
Quantum Brain Chipset & Bio Processor (BioVLSI)
Prof. PhD. Dr. Kamuro
Quantum Physicist and Brain Scientist involved in Caltech & AERI Associate Professor and Brain Scientist in Artificial Evolution Research Institute（ AERI: https://www.aeri-japan.com/ ）
IEEE-USA Fellow
American Physical Society Fellow
PhD. & Dr. Kazuto Kamuro
email: info@aeri-japan.com
--------------------------------------------
【Keywords】 Artificial Evolution Research Institute：AERI
HP： https://www.aeri-japan.com/
#ArtificialBrain #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #armor #AntiNuclearwarfare #ArmorSystem #QuantumSemiconductor #QuantumComputer #QuantumInterference #QuantumArtificialIntelligence #Quantumphysics #QuantumConsciousness #QuantumMind #QuntumBrainComputing #QuntumBrainComputer #QuantumBrainChipset #QuantumBrainChip #QuantumBioProcessor #QuantumBioChip #Quantumbrain #brain #biocomputer #BrainScience #Biologyphysics #BrainMachineInterface #BMI #BCI #BioResourceGowthEnvironmentAssessment #BrainScience #BrainComputing #BioProcessor #BrainChip #BrainProcessor #braincomputer #BrainInplant #BiologicalWarefare #BiologicalBattlefield #Blackhole #BMILSI #NeuralConnectionDevice #nanosizeSemiconductors #nextgenerationSemiconductors #NonDestructiveTesting #nextgenerationDefense #Nuclearweaponsdisablement #Nuclearbaseattack #NextGenerationWarfare ##NonlinearOptics #Nonlinear #NonlinearInteraction #renewableenergy #GeoThermalpower #GlobalWarming #GreenhouseGases #GreenhousegasDetection #GlobalWarmingPrevention #Globalglobalwarming #MissileDefense #MissileIntercept #NuclearDeterrence #MEGAEarthquakePrediction #MissileInterception #MolecularComputer #MolecularBrain #military #militaryhardware #militaryweapon #MilitarySoldier #MissileDefenseSystem #ModeLocking #MultiphotonMicroscopy #MaterialProcessing #Micromachining #MultiphotoMicroscopy #MilitaryApplication #weaponsindustry #weaponofmassdestruction #WarEconomic #opticalSemiconductors #OpticalParametricAmplification #OPA #Ophthalmology #LifePrediction #LongerInfraStructurelife #LifespanPrediction #LaserDefenseSystem #LaserInducedPlasma #LaserSpectroscopy #LaserAblation #LaserArmor #UltrashortpulseLasers #UltrahighpowerLasers #unmannedweapon #UltraLSI #UltrafastSpectroscopy #SatelliteOptoelectronics #selfassembly #soldier #strategicweapon #Security #Supernovae #SurfaceStructuring #SteerableMirror #TerroristDeterrence #TerroristDetection #TacticalLaserWeapon #TacticalLaser #RemoteSensing #RegenerativeEnergy #RenewableEergy #Reprogrammable #robotarmor #roboticweapons #RobotSOLDIER #Climatechange #cerebralnerves #combataircraft #cyborg #combatKilling #chemicalWarefare #chemicalBattlefield #ChirpedPulseAmplification #CPA #CavityDumping #CounterUAV #CounterUAS #Defense #DefenseElectronics #Defensiveweapons #DomesticResiliency ##Dermatology #DirectedEnergyWeapons #EnemystrikeCapability #ExplosiveDetection #EplosiveDetection #EnemybaseAttackCapability #eruptionPrediction #EarthquakePrediction #EnemyBaseAttackAbility #ElectronDynamics #Effects #VolcaniceruptionPrediction #VolcanicTremorDetection #volcanicEruptionGasDetection #ICBMInterception #implanttype #HumanitarianStrategy #HAMIIS #HexaWattLaser #HighEnergyPhysics #HighEnergyLaser #PetawattLaser #Pulsar #ParametricAmplification #FemtosecondLaser #FemtosecondPulse #FrequencyConversion #HarmonicHGeneration #FixedMirror
Comments